On May 26, 2026, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) announced the addition of 18 entities and individuals to its Russia sanctions list. Among those listed was Panama-registered Huobi Global S.A.—the operating entity of the cryptocurrency exchange HTX.
According to Reuters and CoinDesk, this marks the first time the UK has applied bank-grade sanctioning tools (Regulation 17A) to a cryptocurrency exchange.
UK authorities accuse HTX of providing financial services to two entities with strategic ties to Russia: the Kremlin-backed A7 payment network (which issues the ruble-pegged stablecoin A7A5) and Garantex, a Moscow-based crypto exchange previously sanctioned by the United States.
According to disclosures by the UK Foreign Office, the A7 network processed over $90 billion in funds last year, equivalent to roughly half of Russia's annual military expenditure. The UK believes the network funneled approximately $1.5 billion back into Russia via a Kyrgyz bank and a major crypto exchange.
Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic noted in its blog that HTX, with an estimated trading volume of $3.3 trillion in 2025, is one of the world's largest crypto exchanges. Another on-chain data firm, Global Ledger, estimated in a report that between 2021 and May 2026, HTX processed approximately $21.06 billion in high-risk fund flows. Of this, $7.64 billion was linked to Russian entities and darknet markets (such as Hydra).
The sanctions are effective immediately and include the following specific measures:
Severing Correspondent Relations: UK financial institutions are prohibited from maintaining correspondent banking relationships with the sanctioned entities.
Freezing Funds: UK-registered virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must freeze relevant funds.
Expanded Tracking: Compliance checks must trace multi-hop transactions on the blockchain, rather than strictly focusing on direct counterparties.
Elliptic noted that this model could serve as a reference framework for other regulators, marking the formal extension of traditional financial sanction rules into the digital asset space.
According to a follow-up report by CoinDesk on May 27, major exchanges including Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Bitget swiftly issued user notices following the sanctions announcement:
Binance: Transactions involving HTX may require additional compliance reviews.
OKX: Warned users who previously engaged in arbitrage trading between HTX and OKX that continuing to transfer funds could trigger account reviews.
Bybit: Advised users to avoid using HTX-related addresses for deposits and withdrawals, noting that such actions will face extra Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks.
Bitget: Updated its sanctions screening system; transactions involving sanctioned entities may be rejected, restricted, or lead to account termination.
Analysts point out that over $100 million in USDT held by HTX also faces the risk of being frozen by the stablecoin's issuer.
HTX released a statement on the social platform X, denying the allegations that it assisted Russia's financial infrastructure. The company emphasized: "Huobi Global S.A., which is included in the sanctions list, is a legally distinct entity from the online operating HTX exchange. This sanction will not and should not have any impact on the HTX online exchange." HTX also stated that it had rejected the listing application for the A7A5 stablecoin and would cooperate with UK authorities to understand the basis for the sanctions.
Justin Sun personally promised "full compliance" in a report via Yahoo Finance. Furthermore, BeInCrypto reported that HTX assured all user funds remain safe and its global operations are unaffected.
It is worth noting that the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) previously filed a lawsuit against HTX in October 2025, accusing it of promoting crypto asset services to UK consumers without authorization. The recent sanctions further intensify the compliance pressure on HTX in the UK market.
The sanctions package also targets other entities, including Rapira Group LLC, Aifory LLC, Arvix LLC, Bitpapa IC FZC LLC, and the issuer of the Kyrgyzstan-linked gold-pegged stablecoin USDKG. Sanctioned individuals include Sergey Mendeleev, Igor Gorin, Irina Akopyan, and Israeli national Liran Cohen.
OSL | Secure Ramps. Trusted Rails !
Businesses can reduce stablecoin settlement risk by treating settlement as a controlled workflow, not only as a token transfer. They should review the stablecoin issuer, reserves, redemption terms, counterparties,...
How Businesses Can Manage Stablecoin Settlement Risk in Corporate Payments?
A stablecoin may be considered institutional grade when enterprises can review its issuer, reserve transparency, governance, redemption assumptions, compliance controls, operational workflow and reporting evidence....
What Makes a Stablecoin Institutional Grade?
Compliance teams should ask about USDGO's issuer, reserves, attestations, redemption assumptions, eligible users, supported routes, jurisdictions, onboarding, screening, recordkeeping, reporting, fees and exception...
What Compliance Teams Should Review Before Using USDGO for Payments and Settlement?
To explain stablecoin risk controls to a corporate board, management should separate the asset, service route, counterparties, controls and reporting model. The board should see issuer and reserve review, eligibility...
How Corporate Boards Can Review Stablecoin Risk Controls for Payments and Settlement?
Stablecoin compliance matters for corporate payments because payment teams must confirm the asset, counterparty, route, jurisdiction, approval process, screening, records and reconciliation controls before value...
Why Stablecoin Compliance Matters for Corporate Payment Workflows?
Stablecoin settlement can give importers and exporters an additional route for agreed cross-border trade obligations. A workable route begins with the sales contract and invoice: the parties must define the amount,...
How Can Stablecoin Settlement Support Import and Export Businesses?